Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02440
Original file (BC 2012 02440.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-02440
		
		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED: NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

1.	The fitness assessment (FA) dated 31 January 2012, be removed 
from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).

2.	By amendment, the applicant requests the cardio component of 
his fitness assessments, dated 10 October 2013, 25 March 2013, 
21 September 2012, 31 May 2012, 26 April 2011, 5 November 2010, 
22 January 2009, 23 June 2005, 22 April 2005 and 20 October 
2004, be removed from AFFMS.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He received unsatisfactory FA scores due to his marginal run 
times.  He has had multiple appointments with his primary care 
manager (PCM) since 2008 addressing his left knee pain:  he was 
told it was fine.  It was not until he failed the third FA in 
January 2012, that an MRI revealed he had a torn ACL and 
Meniscus.  

After the MRI results, he was sent to the orthopedic clinic and 
physical therapy.  According to the Physical Therapist, he had 
developed the muscles around his knee as much as he could and 
his knee would not get better without surgery.  He finally had 
surgery on 9 May 2012.  

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal 
statement, the fitness assessment scorecard, medical records a 
physician’s note and other supporting documentation.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of technical sergeant.  

A resume of the applicant’s FA results are as follows:

Date 
Composite Score
Rating
*10 Oct 13 91.50 Excellent
*25 Mar 13 78.80 Satisfactory
*21 Sep 12 86.25 Satisfactory
*31 May 12 58.50 Unsatisfactory 
*31 Jan 12 58.20 Unsatisfactory
 22 Jul 12 83.60 Satisfactory 
*26 Apr 11 67.40 Unsatisfactory
* 5 Nov 10 27.80 Unsatisfactory
 16 Apr 10 78.50 Good
 14 Oct 09 75.30 Good
 29 Apr 09 75.50 Good
*22 Jan 09 59.00 Poor
 31 Jan 08 77.25 Good
 30 Jan 06 77.60 Good
 31 Oct 05 73.95 Marginal
*23 Jun 05 Exempt Exempt
*22 Apr 05 73.30 Marginal
*20 Oct 04 70.60 Marginal
* Contested FAs

On 22 September 2012, the applicant administratively closed his 
case stating that he needed time to gather additional evidence.  
In a letter dated 5 February 2013, the applicant requested his 
case be reopened.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this case are 
contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility which is at Exhibit C. 

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial.  The applicant states he failed 
his fitness assessment due to the pain in his left knee.  He 
contends he pressed it because he was unaware that he could stop 
the assessment without being given a failing score.  He claims 
his knee was evaluated and it was found that his pain was caused 
by a torn ACL and meniscus.

On 20 June 2012, AFPC/DPSIM requested additional documentation 
from the applicant:  specifically, copies of the AF Form 108, AF 
Form 469 and AF Form 422 completed by the military treatment 
facility.  That documentation was not received.

The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 28 August 2012, for review and comment within 
30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, this office has received 
no response.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  After a 
thorough review of the evidence presented, we are not persuaded 
that the fitness assessments are erroneous or unjust as 
recorded.  As such, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion and find that the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  In 
the absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary, we find no 
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-02440 in Executive Session on 6 February 2014 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-02440 was considered:

  Exhibit A1.  DD Form 149, dated 31 May 12, w/atchs.
  Exhibit A2.  Additional Submission, dated 10 Jul 12, w/atchs.
  Exhibit A3.  Additional Submission, dated 12 Dec 12, w/atchs.
  Exhibit B.   Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
  Exhibit C.   Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 25 Jul, w/atchs.
  Exhibit D.   Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Aug 13.



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04404

    Original file (BC-2011-04404.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04404 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His official military records be corrected by having his Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 27 Oct 11, declared void and removed. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05468

    Original file (BC 2012 05468.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A commander can only recommend the removal of a fitness score when a member is unable to complete the FA due to a medical condition which is validated by a medical provider. In this case, after the applicant sustained his injury, there is no indication a medical provider exempted him from any components of the FA or that his commander invalidated the test. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01787

    Original file (BC 2013 01787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The medical documents mentioned above validates the applicant had a medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score on the contested FA. DPSIM indicates he has not provided documentation from his medical provider stating his medical condition would prevent him from achieving a passing score on the contested FA. In this respect, the applicant failed to provide a letter from his medical provider stating how his medical condition prevented him from passing the AC component...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04035 (2)

    Original file (BC 2013 04035 (2).txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a letter dated 22 Oct 13, the demotion authority reinstated his grade to SSgt with his original Date of Rank (DOR) of 9 Jan 13. As such, if the applicant wants to make a request to remove the referral EPRs, he must first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief provided by existing law or regulations, such as the Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB) prior to seeking relief before this Board, as required by the governing Air Force Instruction. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05000

    Original file (BC 2012 05000.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIM further recommends the fitness assessments dated 27 Sep 11, 30 Dec 11, and 28 Mar 12 be corrected to reflect the applicant was exempt from the waist measurement component of these FAs. The complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He was told he had to participate in the abdominal circumference for the 29 Mar 11 FA, not knowing there was an AF Form 422...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01591

    Original file (BC 2013 01591.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 29 Nov 2011, a medical evaluation letter was signed by the same provider who issued the previous AF Form 469s. The letter states, “There are medical conditions that preclude this member from achieving a passing score on the Air Force fitness assessment.” On 1 Dec 2011, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was initiated from his Medical Provider, which could exempt the applicant from the cardio and push-up components of the FA. On 27 Mar 2012, a medical evaluation letter was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00248

    Original file (BC-2013-00248.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of push-ups and sit-ups completed within one minute each). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03994

    Original file (BC-2012-03994.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last five FA results: Date Composite Score Rating 28 Aug 12 00 Unsatisfactory 13 Mar 12 39.63 Unsatisfactory 23 May 11 n/a Exempt 28 Apr 11 10.38 Unsatisfactory 22 Oct 10 49.40 Unsatisfactory The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03146

    Original file (BC-2012-03146.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03146 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 13 Mar 12 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). However, the Air Force office of primary responsibility has reviewed this evidence and recommends the record not be disturbed since the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02006

    Original file (BC-2012-02006.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His provider’s memorandum for record (MFR) stated he had a medical condition that prevented him from attaining a passing score on the walking component of his FA; however, the test was not removed from his records. Upon expiration of your 42 days reconditioning, you are cleared to test in all components of the AF Fitness Test.” On 29 May 12, a memorandum was sent to applicant requesting additional documentation for removal of his FA dated 29 Oct 10. While he contends that he was...